Opinion: Greenwashing The Jones Library Expansion

2

Photo: istock

By Jeff Lee and Art Keene

This last year has seen the Jones Library Building Committee (JLBC) aggressively eliminating environmentally friendly features from the building plan as part of the “value engineering” efforts to bring down the costs. While it is disputed whether a net-zero building was ever promised, the prospect of getting such a building disappeared from their planning a long time ago. We are now assured that our building will be only “net-zero ready.”  And given the lack of transparency on the part of the JBLC and the Jones trustees, it is not at all clear that the library will have any environmentally friendly features if construction eventually commences. This, at a time when environmental responsibility is more important than ever.

Our latest concern is that the state’s new stretch codes requiring stricter climate friendly features (like triple glazed windows)  went into effect on July 1.  Library trustees indicated that they would file for a building permit prior to July 1 in order to absolve them of having to comply with new stretch codes. However, they failed to file their application on time and hence it looks like they will have to meet the new environmental standards. That is certain to drive up costs which are already projected to be way over budget.

We have been making inquiries of those close to the library project to get clarifications about commitments to environmental goals and about what environmental features have already been struck from the building plans. The library leadership have been less than forthcoming, though Town Manager Paul Bockelman has promised a comprehensive update on on the project for the August 17 Town Council meeting.  We are gravely concerned about the JBLC’s apparent retreat from climate goals in such a large project and worry that it is indicative of the town’s faltering commitment to meet its 2030 climate goals. We believe that the town and the JBLC have an obligation to rededicate their efforts to create a state-of-the-art, environmentally forward, climate friendly building consistent with the original claims and promises.  Otherwise, all that we have heard to date is just so much greenwashing.

Here are 13 instances of where the Jones expansion project appears to be greenwashing. 

1.Choosing not to pursue LEED certification and the hundreds of thousands of dollars such certification could bring in Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners (MBLC) incentives.

2.Eliminating from the design any generation of on-site energy via photovoltaics or geothermal.

3.Backing off plans to use low-embodied carbon materials such as real slate on the roof and granite pavers on the outside.

4.Replacing all-cross-laminated-timber (CLT) construction with a hybrid of steel and CLT.  It appears there are no CLT beams in the 15,000 sq. ft. addition.

5.Eliminating originally-planned saw-tooth roof skylights which would have increased natural light in the building. As now planned, it will require more electric lighting

6.Eliminating the originally proposed energy conservation measure of window overhangs

7.Introducing Hardie Board as an exterior material.  It needs to be painted every ten years, which will add to operating expenses which before long will exceed the money saved by this design change.

8.Not performing an updated Energy Use Intensity (EUI) analysis during the Design Development phase so that the effects on EUI caused by Value Engineering design changes can be understood.

9.Dropping consideration of triple-glazed windows which figured into previously promised EUI numbers

10.Not evaluating design changes for how they might reduce Eversource energy credits that the capital campaign is relying on

11.Not disclosing to the pubic all the eliminated design features that may negatively impact EUI and embodied carbon.

12.Accepting a $1.1 million Federal HUD grant for sustainability measures while doing all of the above which run counter to bona fide sustainability.

13.Claiming, without evidence, to be building one of the most climate-friendly libraries in the state.

Jeff Lee is a career computer programmer and regular observer of local government. He has lived in Amherst since 1994 and in the Pioneer Valley since 1973 when he began grad work in mathematics at UMass. He formerly served on the Amherst Redevelopment Authority and as a member of Town Meeting. He is a frequent contributor to the Amherst Indy.

Art Keene is Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at UMass. He coached girls cross country at Amherst High School for 17 years and was a town meeting member for 20+ years.  He has lived in Amherst since 1982.   He is Managing Editor of the Amherst Indy.

Spread the love

2 thoughts on “Opinion: Greenwashing The Jones Library Expansion

  1. A word in Instance #13 caught my eye: “claiming.” Throughout this whole process, library trustees and their supporters have made claim after unsubstantiated claim. Here are the most egregrious ones:

    1. Claiming that the Jones is among the most dysfunctional libraries in the entire state.
    2. Claiming that the current layout of the library — the nooks and crannies for quiet reading — make it “dangerous,” and implying that if “incidents” have not already happened, it is only a matter of time until they do.
    3. Claiming that the Jones must serve a population of some 50,000, conveniently including the UMass student population while somehow forgetting the extensive resources of campus libraries.
    4. Claiming that fundraising goals are reasonable, reachable, and nearly in hand, and constantly adjusting the the timeline for when the floodgates of donations will finally open.
    5. Claiming that the project must go forward, no matter its impact on other capital projects.
    6. Claiming overwhelming support by residents, while neglecting to put such numbers into the context of continuing low voter turnout.

    Reasonable individuals who challenge these claims are demonized as a small and vocal minority standing in the way of progress because of sheer willfulness. There is little recognition that unsubstantiated claims often exact a price when the reality they push up against finally proves to be unyielding. Who will pay if and when this happens?

  2. It will become even worse when the Town’s budget for legal representation of its regular and “special municipal” employees begins to grow.

    Please pay close attention, for example, when the Jones Library, Incorporated, comes before the Historical Commission this September….

Leave a Reply

The Amherst Indy welcomes your comment on this article. Comments must be signed with your real, full name & contact information; and must be factual and civil. See the Indy comment policy for more information.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.